Skip to main content

This workbook contains external data connections or BI features that are not supported #projectonline

Just came across the joys of "enable/disable preview features" in office 365 SharePoint Admin.

 My users were reporting that they were unable to refresh published Project Online reports in their browser.  They received the following message:

                       This workbook contains external data connections or BI features that are not supported.

 The issue was caused by a setting in the SharePoint Online Admin Portal (Admin | SharePoint | Settings).  

 Selecting Enable Preview Features (see below) allows users to refresh Project Online Reports using oData feeds in their browser.  

As a reminder, the following two elements also need enabling if you haven't done so already:
user group permissions:

Site collection features: 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Issues update on #projectserver2013 - Timesheets and Publishing

Reporting Publish ** updated with links to other related discussions, and a VBA macro ** the following issue has been noted on publish since June 13 CU was applied: ReportingProjectChangeMessageFailed (24006) - Object reference not set to an instance of an object.. Details: id='24006' name='ReportingProjectChangeMessageFailed' uid='4d869e56-f625-e311-bb41-005056b90052' QueueMessageBody='Project UID='e3f49977-b2bc-e211-8559-005056b90052'. PublishType='ProjectPublish'' Error='Object reference not set to an instance of an object.'. I have seen this noted previously on a similar issue: http://nearbaseline.com/blog/2013/06/ms-reporting-project-publish-jobs-failed-after-aprilcu/comment-page-1/#comment-14741 This is  caused by Baselined Milestones having NULL Baseline Cost values Original bug note with potential workaround is here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brismith/archive/2012/05/23/project-server-2007-reporting-project-pu...
4 comments
Read more

#projectserver2013 VIEW FAILURE: The view failed to load. Press OK to reload this view with the default settings. Press cancel to select another view.

** UPDATE ** includes notes relating to secondary bug where Timesheet is created without Administrative tasks. Does this ring any bells? This has been bugging me for months, but finally I have a repro for this: Issue Summary:  When a task is deleted from a plan that is approved into a previous or current timesheet - even when there are no actuals on the task - you can no longer view the timesheet The following repro has been proven: - Setup system with Single Entry Mode, with enforced Status Approval before Timesheet Approval - Create resource as own timesheet manager - Create new project - Create two tasks in the same week, starting monday with 5 days duration:  1) Task to assign actuals, 2) Task to delete post submission - Assign Resource to tasks - publish project - as Timesheet User, go to the appropriate timesheet period for the tasks created - Assign actual work to one task (task 1), leaving task 2 with no actual work - Submit timesheet - as Project ...
6 comments
Read more

Restoring PWA Site to another Web App in the same Farm

The scenario is this: SharePoint 2016 Farm with Project Server Two Web Apps Development UAT One PWA on Development Web App. I want to copy the PWA Site on Development web app to UAT to support a testing cycle. As far as I knew there were two options: 1) Content Database Restore and Attach Process would be backup your Dev Content Database, Restore to a new Content Database for QA, then mount the database on the appropriate web app and your off.... Problem:  Although you can do this with the -AssignNewDatabaseID switch in Powershell (to avoid two content db's having the same database id) the Site Collection (PWA) in the db still retains its SiteID which means there is a duplicate SiteID in the Configuration Database.  This stops the PWA site being created and alllocated correctly and becomes essentially orphaned. This method is only any good for MOVING not COPYING Back to the drawing board... 2) Backup-SPSite / Restore-SPSite I didn't believe this ...
1 comment
Read more