Skip to main content

Problem Provisioning PWA Site after SP1

** UPDATE2:  OK so I didn't reboot before that previous note.  This has now resolved the issue.  Reboot WAS tried prior to June CU


* UPDATE:  After installing June CU2011 Server Rollups (SPF & SPS+PS) I am still seeing the same issues as before.  More research to do.....


Since my rig had Project Server 2010 SP1 packages installed I have seen PWA provisioning fail when creating a brand new PWA Site with clean DB names etc.


Note:  This is NOT a restore scenario:


Firstly I see the following, which is what I would expect:




09/19/2011 15:45:59.32 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x0C30)                   0x05C4 Project Server                 Provisioning                   6974 Information Provisioning 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz': Server versions: Primary 10.50.1600.1, Reporting 10.50.1600.1. 47871661-d3d4-46fa-9c73-f5faf328a37d





09/19/2011 15:45:59.35 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x0C30)                   0x05C4 Project Server                 Provisioning                   6975 Information Provisioning 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz': Databases specified for site 'ProjectServer' are as follows: Published: Name = 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz_Published', State = NotCreated Draft: Name = 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz_Draft', State = NotCreated Archive: Name = 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz_Archive', State = NotCreated Reporting: Name = 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz_Reporting', State = NotCreated 47871661-d3d4-46fa-9c73-f5faf328a37d

Then a little while later prior to the above job completing I see a second PWA Provisioning job is initiated, that reuses the PWA Site url configured by me and then shows the following in ULS:

09/19/2011 15:49:59.61 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x18CC)                   0x2238 Project Server                 Provisioning                   6974 Information Provisioning 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz': Server versions: Primary 10.50.1600.1, Reporting 10.50.1600.1. 27bbee07-9442-48ce-af3e-eb7dabaf80ea

09/19/2011 15:49:59.95 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x18CC)                   0x2238 Project Server                 Provisioning                   6975 Information Provisioning 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz': Databases specified for site 'ProjectServer' are as follows: Published: Name = 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz_Published', State = NotEmpty Draft: Name = 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz_Draft', State = Empty Archive: Name = 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz_Archive', State = Empty Reporting: Name = 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz_Reporting', State = Empty 27bbee07-9442-48ce-af3e-eb7dabaf80ea

Shortly after this, guess what:

09/19/2011 15:49:59.95 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x18CC)                   0x2238 Project Server                 Provisioning                   7070 Critical Provisioning 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz': One or more of the databases already contains schema. When editing or creating a Project Server instance, you may specify: * Four databases that do not exist * Four existing, blank databases * Four existing Project Server databases of the same version from the same installation. Combinations of blank, new, and existing databases are not allowed. 27bbee07-9442-48ce-af3e-eb7dabaf80ea
Subtle but important difference here... this second provisioning job that appears to have been initiated part way through the initial DB provisioning job now sees that the Published database = NotEmpty state.

Hypothesis here is that the first correct provision job has begun to build the  DB schema, and then been kicked out by the erroneous second job, which finds a mismatch set of databases and bombs out.

Resolution:

So far it appears that the June CU resolves this issue, but I am retesting this now.  be back after the break
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SP2 released

Office Project Server 2007 Sp2 has now been released.  see the details here - http://blogs.msdn.com/chrisfie/archive/2009/04/28/announcing-service-pack-2-sp2-for-microsoft-project-2007-and-microsoft-project-server-2007.aspx .  see teh webcast here http://blogs.msdn.com/brismith/archive/2009/04/28/project-server-2007-service-pack-2-sp2-is-now-available.aspx Blogged with the Flock Browser
Post a Comment
Read more

TPG Apps Highlights - Risk Matrix #projectonline #projectserver #risk

This post is the first of a series to highlight the apps available for Project Server and Project Online from the SharePoint store  ( https://store.office.com/search.aspx?productgroup=SharePoint&qu=tpg ) and direct via your local TPG office. The first of this series will look at the s imple plug-and-play apps that all users of Project Online can make use of quickly and easily.   T hese are: Risk Matrix  Milestone Trend Analysis (MTA) WBS Chart viewer Next we will focus on the challenge of  Resource Request Supply and Demand by demonstrating our more recent TeamLink and TeamManager apps. Team Manager App is a Resource Manager/Owner app for allocating resource supply to Projects and BAU activities and monitoring demands against commitments Team Link App is a PM tool for monitoring Project demands vs the supply provided by the Resource Managers  Finally I will highlight some of the benefits of our integration tools when used in the context of Project Online
Post a Comment
Read more

Restoring PWA Site to another Web App in the same Farm

The scenario is this: SharePoint 2016 Farm with Project Server Two Web Apps Development UAT One PWA on Development Web App. I want to copy the PWA Site on Development web app to UAT to support a testing cycle. As far as I knew there were two options: 1) Content Database Restore and Attach Process would be backup your Dev Content Database, Restore to a new Content Database for QA, then mount the database on the appropriate web app and your off.... Problem:  Although you can do this with the -AssignNewDatabaseID switch in Powershell (to avoid two content db's having the same database id) the Site Collection (PWA) in the db still retains its SiteID which means there is a duplicate SiteID in the Configuration Database.  This stops the PWA site being created and alllocated correctly and becomes essentially orphaned. This method is only any good for MOVING not COPYING Back to the drawing board... 2) Backup-SPSite / Restore-SPSite I didn't believe this w
1 comment
Read more